
Coming Monday October 15, 2007 with the launch of Steve’s new book: A special offer of free bonus gifts from Larry Prusak, Jim Kouzes, Chip Heath, Kevin Ekenberry, Katlina Groh, Shawn Callahan, Svend-Erik Engh and Steve Denning to all purchasers of The Secret Language of Leadership. To collect your gifts, check back here on Monday October 15, 2007 |
| What are the main types of stories and narratives? There are many different types of stories, with different labels. Let's start with the simplest:
So what's the difference between "story" and "narrative"? Good question! For a discussion of this issue, click here For other terms in use, consider:
The phenomenon of anti-story is something that one needs to be aware of when telling stories in an organization. The phenomenon will occur spontaneously and naturally, no matter how powerful the story one tells. The scene then becomes a battle between competing stories. The competing stories may co-exist for an extended period, or one story may "overcome" the other, and become the accepted account of what is going on. One can perhaps envisage a sequence: Story >> Anti-story >> Eventual Story The Eventual Story may be the same as the original Story (if the original Story is "triumphant"), or the same as the Anti-story (if the opponents of that Story are "triumphant"), or perhaps a new story, combining elements of the original Story and the Anti-story. Anti-story can be used as a powerful tool to undermine
the position of one's opponents particularly where they are circulating
untrue rumors or unreasonable criticism in the The anti-story doesn't work very well against a rumor
that is true or a criticism that is reasonable. In those situations,
one should admit the truth and say what one is going to be done about
it. Macbeth, Act V, Scene v.
What's the difference between "narrative" and "story"? In common usage: none. So in my books, The Secret Language of Leadership and The Leader's Guide to Storytelling, I use narrative and story as synonyms, in the broad sense of an account of a set of events that are causally related. One could fill a whole library with the academic discussion swirling around such a simple commonsense notion. Here, I will only allude to a few of the issues. Various practitioners have suggested different definitions. For some, story should be defined in the narrower sense of a well-told story, with a protagonist, a plot, and a turning point leading to a resolution. For them, narrative might be used in the broader sense I employ in this book. In this view, locutions that lack the traditional elements of a well-told story are not so much stories as ideas for possible stories yet to be told, or fragments of stories. (See for instance: Y. Gabriel, Storytelling in Organizations: Facts, Fictions and Fantasies -- Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2000). Others have suggested that story should be used in the broader sense I am suggesting, while narrative should be used in the narrower sense of “a story as told by a narrator.” On this view, “narrative = story + theme”: the theme is a layer added to the story to instruct, to provide an emotional connection, or to impart a deeper meaning. (See for instance L. Vincent, Legendary Brands: Unleashing the Power of Storytelling to Create a Winning Market Strategy (Chicago: Dearborn Trade, 2002). In practice, the actual everyday usage of both story and narrative is very broad. Polkinghorne and others have suggested that we accept this broad meaning and treat story and narrative as synonyms: D. E. Polkinghorne, Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988. Polkinghorne defines both narrative and story as “the fundamental scheme for linking individual human actions and events into interrelated aspects of an understandable composite.” Polkinghorne, Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences, p. 13. Within the broad field of story, we can then distinguish classically structured stories, well-made stories, minimalist stories, anti-stories, fragmentary stories, stories with no ending, stories with multiple endings, stories with multiple beginnings, stories with endings that circle back to the beginning, comedies, tragedies, detective stories, romances, folk tales, novels, theater, movies, television mini-series, and so on, without the need to get into quasi-theological discussions as to what is truly a story. In common
usage, story is a large tent, with many variations within the tent.
Some variations are more useful for some purposes than others. There
are probably many variations that haven’t yet been identified.
If we start out with predetermined ideas of what a “real story”
is, we may end up missing useful forms of narrative. |
||
| References: Stephen Denning, The Springboard: How Storytelling Ignites Action in Knowledge-Era Organizations. Boston, London, Butterworth Heinemann, October 2000. Donald E. Polkinghorne, Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. Albany N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1988. |
Steve Denning consults and gives workshops and keynote presentations on topics that include: leadership, innovation, organizational storytelling, business storytelling, springboard storytelling, knowledge management, branding, marketing, values, communication, communities of practice, business performance, collective intelligence, tacit knowledge, business collaboration, knowledge, learning, community, performance improvement, visionary leadership, social potential, institutional community building, and internal communications. You can contact Steve at steve@stevedenning.com
Copyright © 2000-2004 Stephen Denning Webmaster CR WEB CONSULTING